FIA post-race press conference – 2024 United States Grand Prix ...

Q: Charles says the team must aim at the Constructors' Championship now. With that in mind, which circuits do you think will suit the Ferrari going forward? What about Mexico next weekend?

CS: Yeah, if I would have to bet, I would say Mexico and Vegas are good tracks based on last year. I'm basing myself a bit on last year. This year everything seems a bit different. But yeah, and then I think Qatar is going to be a bit our bogey track, if I would have to bet again my money and then Abu Dhabi I'm not sure. I'm not sure what we can achieve in Abu Dhabi, but let's see. I just hope this pace shows itself again before the end of the season and gives me another chance of going at it.

Q: Alright. Very well done to you as well. Max, let's come to you now. Great job. You had to work hard for this podium. Can we start by talking about the pace of the car? You've now done a 56 lap race. Are you happy with the step forward that the RB20 has taken this weekend?

MV: I think today wasn't the best race for us compared to yesterday, for example. Just struggling for balance, for grip. Couldn't really brake, rotate the car. So yeah, quite quickly onwards, I realised that we're not going to win the race. But just tried to do my own race. I think we did the best strategy we could as a team. And then it was just surviving to the end. And then, of course, Lando arrived. We had some really good battles, honestly. It was really a lot of fun. But yeah, overall, it was still quite a tough race for me.

Q: What about the first stint? If I could just reference a radio message that GP mentioned to you. He talked about there being an issue that they would sort of the pit stop. What was that?

MV: No clue. I didn't ask. I just drove.

Q: And it was a very short pit stop, so it seemed like it didn't hold you back?

MV: Yeah, I didn't ask yet, so I don't know.

Q: Alright. Can we just elaborate a little bit on the battle with Lando? Two significant moments in the race. Turn 1, first of all. Turn 1, lap one. Talk us through that?

MV: There was a gap on the inside, so I went for it. That corner is very wide, so it gives you a lot of opportunity of going very wide or try to go really tight. I chose for that option, and I still came out second! Started second, came out second out of Turn 1. This time, of course, it was Charles in front. I think it worked out quite well for me because Charles was anyway faster, so he just pulled away. From there, I just tried to do my own race.

Q: And then in the latter stages, when Lando was gaining on you on fresher tyres, how confident were you of staying ahead?

MV: I just tried to do the best I could, to be honest. My balance wasn't great. I was just not really... I was not able to attack the corners. So, yeah, he was putting a lot of pressure. But around here, it's quite a cool track to defend. There are a lot of possibilities. So, yeah, it makes it good for racing.

Q: And what about the moment, Turn 12, four laps to go? Can you just talk us through the moment he came around the outside?

MV: Yeah, I think it's quite clear: you can't overtake outside of the white line. I mean, I got done for it also here in, I think, 2017 or whatever it was. So I lost my podium like that. So I just remained calm, tried to do the best I could after that to bring the car to the end because it was not easy with the tyres and the situation that I was in. But yeah, overall, I still really enjoyed that battle that we had.

Q: And Max, there were a lot of five-second penalties today issued at Turn 12, cars going around the outside. Is there a solution going forward? Perhaps a gravel trap, as was introduced in Austria earlier this year? Would that work?

MV: I mean, it might help, but we have to deal with bikes as well that race here. They don't like the gravel, so then you have to remove it again. Track days, people spinning off, of course, on track days. You have amateur drivers, professional drivers. It does cost a lot of money when you have to do that, and not every track can do that throughout the year. Yes, it would work, but on the other hand, I'm not sure how sustainable that is for the season.

Q: Okay, look, final one from me. Just how satisfying is it to have extended your championship lead this weekend?

MV: That is definitely the positive. I did hope for a little bit more performance today, so that's what we have to analyse, why today we were just not that good. I think everyone was a little bit better or at least the same as yesterday, and it felt like we were definitely worse. So I need to understand why that was, because I don't know at the moment.

QUESTIONS FROM THE FLOOR

Q: (Fillip Cleeren – Motorsport.com) For Max, please. As you say, Lando overtook you off the track, but obviously McLaren will argue that you also went off, so you kind of forced him to. Do you sympathise with that position?

MV: No, I don't. I mean, they complain about a lot lately anyway, but it's very clear in the rules. Outside the white line, you cannot pass. I've been done for it as well in the past.

Q: (Ben Waterworth – Raw Sports Australia) For Charles, you obviously talk about the Constructors' Championship being a target for Ferrari for yourself. 79 points behind Max with five rounds to go. A bit of a long shot, but if Max and Lando keep fighting the way they are, do you kind of look at a sneaky chance of the Drivers' Championship at all?

CL: I mean, never say never. Let's say that for the Constrictors, if we do everything perfect until the end of the season, no matter what McLaren does, if we do better than them, I think we can still clinch that title. With the drivers, I see it a bit in a different way. Even if we do everything perfect, I feel like it will require a little bit of luck inside that to try and get that title, and we cannot really rely on luck. So the Drivers’ seems to be quite unlikely, but again, I'll believe in it until it's mathematically impossible. But trickier.

Q: (Luke Smith – The Athletic) For Charles and Carlos. I don't know if you've seen the incident between Max and Lando, but could I get your thoughts on it and the racing rules? Do you feel they're clear in Formula 1, what you can and can't do in battle?

CL: I haven't seen any of it. I mean, I just saw the Turn 1, which I think was fine. I mean, it's hard racing, and everybody will try something like that anyway. So nothing to comment there, but I haven't seen any of the rest.

CS: Yeah, I haven't analysed it either.

Q: (Luke Smith – The Athletic) And clarity on racing rules? Do you feel it's clear what you can and can't do in battle?

CS: I think some things are. Others are still a bit blurry to me, let's put it like that. I think there was an example yesterday with Oscar's overtake. That for me was completely fine and very similar to anything that we've done between each other on the sprint. And I felt like the penalty on Oscar yesterday was really, really harsh and didn't go along with some guidelines that I thought were the way they were. So yeah, that penalty surprised me yesterday. About today, I have no clue because I haven't seen, I haven't gone five seconds by five seconds penalty to see. So let's see.

CL: Yeah, I agree with Carlos on Oscar's penalty yesterday. I also thought it was a bit too harsh. However, on the rules, I think they are clear. Sometimes the interpretation of the rule can be a little bit different because it will be impossible to have a rule book that takes every single scenario. Every scenario is different, has its particularity, and you've got to analyse it in a different way and interpret the rules in some ways for particular scenarios, which is what the FIA is trying to do best. However, sometimes we disagree, and I think on the one of yesterday, it's something that we'll probably talk of in the next driver briefing.

Q: (Matthieu Piccon – Motorsinside.com) A question for Charles. We heard you during the race talking about plan A, B, and C. Was it always a goal to do a one-stopper, or did you address based on the gap you had on Max?

CL: Yeah, we adjusted it. However, at one point, like at lap 15 or 16, we had quite a good gap. So we had the freedom to basically copy whatever Max was doing a lap later, because it's not like he could undercut us. So when you are in this situation, it's quite a lot less stressful because you've just got to copy what the driver behind you does and we had the gap to do so. So then it was more about mirroring what everybody was doing behind more than actually come up with a different strategy at that time.

Q: (Nate Saunders – ESPN) Question for the Ferrari guys. Ravin [Jain] was on the podium with you today. Strategy was kind of seen as a bit of a weak point a couple of years ago. Seems to have really taken a step forward with him. Can you just explain what he's been able to do in that role to kind of, I guess, just increase the confidence in those calls? And yeah, just the changes he's made since he's taken over?

CL: I mean, he's incredible. I have really a lot of trust in Ravin. He's done an excellent job. He's pretty young, too, for a position like that. But he's always super, super calm. And that's really needed. And yeah, he also manages the emotion super well, which maybe in the past was probably one of our weaknesses, speaking of strategy. This has changed a lot with Ravin. And again, he's doing a really, really good job. So I think, yeah, we have a very strong track team at the moment.

CS: Yeah, I think full credit for Ravin and all the strategy team for the progress that's been made in Ferrari over the last couple of years. I think it's been important to see progress in that side. And there's been a lot of work being done behind the scenes. And obviously, Ravin has played a fundamental role in that work. Like I've said many times, having a good car on race day always helps to make the strategy work. And I feel like this year, compared to last year, we have a very strong car on race day. The best example is today. A car that allows you to be the first one to box and still extend the Hard tyre and still be quick on the Hard tyre and not and not be because of being the first one to box, then degrading more than the others. That is something that I've struggled in the past, especially last year, a lot with that. And yeah, Singapore, I remember boxing in lap 14 of a 70-lap race or a 60-lap race and still making it to the end. With any other car or with any other year that we've had, were degradation and the car was weaker in the race, this wouldn't be possible. So making bold strategy moves on race day wouldn't be as easy and you would look more crazy by doing them. And this year, having a car that degrades less the tyres and makes you more competitive on race day also allows you more flexibility and better opportunities to play with the strategy.

Q: (Taylor Powling – Motorsport Monday) Question for Charles. Congratulations on the win. You mentioned in the first that you didn't want to be put under pressure once you came out of the pits. How much apprehension was there about a repeat of Baku?

CL: I mean, apprehension wasn't that big because I could see the gap and the gap was like 10 seconds. So I knew that it was a lot. I knew that Carlos had stopped quite a bit before. Then I learned that Max stopped as well. So for me, there wasn't a lot of reasons for me to go still longer than that, because that will only bring them closer to me when I got out the box. And when you have cold tyres, you don't want to have pressure from behind because you just want to bring the tyres nicely up to temperature. So I do want to find myself in that scenario. So I made it clear to the team. But I think there was at no moment there was any scary thoughts or whatsoever. The gap was plenty.

Q: (Kevin Lyttle – The Austin American Statesman) When you guys left here last year, so much of the story was about the bumpy track. How do you rate it this year after the changes that were made?

CL: I think there's been a massive step forward in the parts where it's been resurfaced. I still think, though, that the first sector is, apart from Turn 1, that has also been resurfaced, Turn 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 there's still quite a bit of work to be done because it's still extremely bumpy. But apart from that, on the resurfaced parts, it's a lot better.

CS: Yeah, much better in general. I think bumps are always going to be in Austin. And it's part of the track character, which drivers accept. And I think it makes the track a bit different compared to others. But there are certain bumps that will need to get work done every year, like the one in 3, 4, and 5. And sometimes I think it's Turn 19 and breaking into Turn 12 sometimes can get quite bumpy. But if the circuit keeps working at it, just to make sure they don't go crazy jumpy, then I think we're in a good place. But I don't mind a certain level of bumpiness to a track.

MV: I agree. Yeah, I trust he said something very good. It's just high speed. You don't want it to be super bumpy. It's dangerous.